Gremmels

Gremmels v. Emersons Sport Training and Fitness

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 20213:21-cv-06104California1,797 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division Chris Gremmels, Case No. 21-cv-06104-LB

Plaintiff,

ORDER SCREENING COMPLAINT

v. WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

Emersons Sport Training and Fitness, Re: ECF No. 1 Defendant. 16 INTRODUCTION The plaintiff, Chris Gremmels, who represents himself in this action and is proceeding in forma pauperis, sued Emersons Sport Training and Fitness for violating “presumably a civil right to protect from stealth sex or drug agent schemes, legal or criminal, in employment OR a fair an explicit punishment immediately.” Before directing the United States Marshal to serve the defendant with the complaint, the court must screen it for minimal legal viability. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The complaint not only does not raise a federal claim but also fails to state a claim upon which relief may plausibly be granted. The court gives the plaintiff leave to amend the complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.