Cameron Dyess v. Estate of Jajuan Lee Morton

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 20214:20-cv-00909California4,282 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CAMERON DYESS, Case No. 20-cv-00909-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 53 ESTATE OF JAJUAN LEE MORTON, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Pending before the Court is Defendant PA Solutions, Inc.’s (“PA Solutions”) motion for summary judgment, for which briefing is complete. Dkt. Nos. 53 (“Mot.”), 55 (“Opp.”), and 57 (“Reply”). For the reasons noted below, the Court GRANTS the motion for summary judgment. I. BACKGROUND On November 23, 2019, Plaintiff Cameron Dyess filed a tort action against the Estate of Jujuan Morton and PA Solutions, Inc (collectively “Defendants”). Dkt. No. 1-2 (“Compl.”) at 17. On February 6, 2020, Defendants removed the action based on diversity jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 1. On January 19, 2021, PA Solutions filed a motion for summary judgment. Dkt. No. 39. On April 21, 2021, the Court denied the motion without prejudice on Rule 56(d) grounds. Dkt. No. 49. On June 30, 2021, PA…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.