Saramiento

Saramiento v. Fresh Harvest, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 20215:20-cv-07974California524 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RIGOBERTO SARAMIENTO, et al., Case No. 20-cv-07974-BLF (SVK)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER ON JOINT DISCOVERY

v. LETTER BRIEF RE PLAINTIFFS'

SUBPOENAS TO VERIZON

FRESH HARVEST, INC., et al., WIRELESS AND AT&T Defendants. Re: Dkt. No.

Before the court is the Parties’ discovery dispute at Dkt. 68 regarding subpoenas served on Verizon and AT&T for call data information for Leticia Ridaura, an officer of defendant Fresh Harvest and Oscar Ramos, the dispatch manager for defendants Fresh Harvest and SMD. Defendants Fresh Harvest and SMD object to the subpoenas as improper and an invasion of privacy. Plaintiff Sarmiento claims that the information sought is relevant because both individuals contacted him and other drivers regardless of whether the drivers were nominally employed by defendants Fresh Harvest, SMD Logistics, Fresh Foods, or Rava Foods. Plaintiff further argues that as limited, the subpoenas do not present an invasion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.