In re Nutanix, Inc. Securities Litigation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RYAN SCHELLER, et al., Case No. 19-cv-01651-WHO
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
v. LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT
NUTANIX, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 229 Defendants.
12 Lead plaintiff California Ironworkers Field Pension Trust (the “Pension Trust”) moves for leave to supplement the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). Defendants Nutanix, Inc., Chief Executive Officer Dheeraj Pandey, and Chief Financial Officer Duston M. William (collectively “Nutanix”) oppose and assert that the motion does not satisfy pleading requirements and violates Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), this matter is appropriate for resolution without oral argument. I VACATE the hearing scheduled for August 18, 2021. For the reasons explained below, the Pension Trust’s motion satisfies pleading standards and does not violate Rule 11. I GRANT the Pension Trust’s motion. BACKGROUND …