Zavislak

Zavislak v. Netflix, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 16, 20215:21-cv-01811California6,332 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MARK ZAVISLAK, Case No. 5:21-cv-01811-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION,

v. MOTION TO DISMISS OR IN THE

ALTERNATIVE FOR SUMMARY

NETFLIX, INC., JUDGMENT, AND MOTION TO STAY

DISCOVERY

Defendant.

Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 19,

Plaintiff Mark Zavislak filed this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) against Defendant Netflix, Inc. (“Netflix”) asserting claims seeking the following: (1) monetary damages under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(A) and (c)(1)(B) for failure to supply information requested pursuant to ERISA § 104(b)(4), 29 U.S.C. § 1024(b)(4); (2) an injunction under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3) requiring Netflix’s production of documents pursuant to § 1024(b)(4); and (3) an injunction requiring Netflix to maintain its benefit plan according to a written…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.