Jew
Johnson v. Jew
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 20-cv-08457-EJD
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST
v. AMENDED COMPLAINT
TOM C. JEW, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 18 Defendants.
Defendants Tom C. Jew and Diane H. Nakagawa Jew (collectively “Defendants”) move to dismiss Plaintiff Scott Johnson’s First Amended Complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). Having considered the Parties’ papers, the Court DENIES Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.1 I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Plaintiff is a level C-5 quadriplegic. First Am. Compl. for Damages and Inj. Relief (“FAC”), Dkt. No. 16 ¶ 1. He cannot walk, has significant manual dexterity impairments, uses a wheelchair, and has a specially equipped van. Id. Defendants own and operate a general dentistry business…