Jew

Johnson v. Jew

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 16, 20215:20-cv-08457California4,175 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 20-cv-08457-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT

TOM C. JEW, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 18 Defendants.

Defendants Tom C. Jew and Diane H. Nakagawa Jew (collectively “Defendants”) move to dismiss Plaintiff Scott Johnson’s First Amended Complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). Having considered the Parties’ papers, the Court DENIES Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.1 I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Plaintiff is a level C-5 quadriplegic. First Am. Compl. for Damages and Inj. Relief (“FAC”), Dkt. No. 16 ¶ 1. He cannot walk, has significant manual dexterity impairments, uses a wheelchair, and has a specially equipped van. Id. Defendants own and operate a general dentistry business…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.