James
James v. United Furniture Workers Local 89262
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANTHONY ALEXANDER JAMES, Case No. 21-cv-03893-JCS
Plaintiff,
ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO
v. DISMISS
UNITED FURNITURE WORKERS Re: Dkt. No.
LOCAL 89262,
11 Defendant.
12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Anthony Alexander James brought this action asserting various clams against Defendant United Furniture Workers Local 89262 (the “Union”) related to the Union’s representation of James during his employment and subsequent termination at Sealy Tempur- Pedic (“Sealy”). The Union now moves to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons discussed below, the Union’s motion is GRANTED, and James’s complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend no later than September 24, 2021.2 II. BACKGROUND A. Procedural History James initially filed this action pro se in the California Superior Court for Alameda County. See generally Compl. (dkt. 1-1). He asserted…