Drevaleva

Drevaleva v. Alsup

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 24, 20213:21-cv-05348California604 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 TATYANA EVGENIEVNA DREVALEVA, Case No. 21-cv-05348-CRB

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING

MOTION TO TRANSFER

WILLIAM H. ALSUP, et al., Defendants.

Plaintiff Tatyana Drevaleva is suing the court and Judge Alsup, who previously presided over her case against her former employer. See Drevaleva v. U.S. Dep’t of Veterans Affs., No. 3:18-cv-03748-JCS. The Court granted Drevaleva’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. See Report and Recommendation (dkt. 7) at 1. Magistrate Judge Beeler then issued a report and recommendation that screened the complaint for minimum legal viability under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and concluded that this lawsuit is “barred by the doctrine of judicial immunity.” Id. at 1–2. The case was reassigned to the undersigned Judge. See Reassignment Order (dkt. 8). Drevaleva has since filed her objections to the report and recommendation. See Supp. Br. (dkt. 11); Opposition…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.