Jurado

Jurado v. Ramirez

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 24, 20214:20-cv-08602California2,351 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBERT JURADO, Case No. 20-cv-08602-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL v.

A RAMIREZ, et al., Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, an inmate at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”), has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His second amended complaint (Dkt. No. 21) is now before the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). Pro se pleadings must, however, be liberally construed. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.