Kramer
Kramer v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
AUDREY E KRAMER, Case No. 21-cv-04266-PJH Plaintiff,
v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al., DISMISS AND MOTION TO
TRANSFER OR, ALTERNATIVELY,
Defendants. DISMISS Re: Dkt. Nos. 5,
Before the court is defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s (“Chase”) motion to dismiss. Dkt. 5. Also before the court is defendants Kent F. Larsen’s (“Larsen”) and Smith Larsen & Wixom’s (“SLW”) motion to transfer or, alternatively, dismiss. Dkt. 12. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART both motions.1 BACKGROUND I. The District of Nevada Action On January 2, 2018, plaintiff Audrey Kramer (“plaintiff”) and her husband, Leo Kramer, filed a lawsuit against Chase in the United…