Namisnak

Namisnak v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20213:17-cv-06124California9,991 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SCOTT CRAWFORD,

Case No. 17-cv-02664-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING MOTIONS IN LIMINE AND MOTION Defendants. TO STRIKE

STEPHAN NAMISNAK, et al., Case No. 17-cv-06124-RS Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING

MOTIONS IN LIMINE AND MOTION

Defendants. TO STRIKE

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs are three people using motorized wheelchairs who asked Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiary Rasier, Inc. (collectively “Defendants” or “Uber”) to provide wheelchair-accessible vehicle (“WAV”) service (“UberWAV”) in their home cities of New Orleans, Louisiana and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.