Mohanna

Mohanna v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 24, 20214:21-cv-03795California492 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KEYHAN MOHANNA, Case No. 21-cv-03795-DMR

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND

v. VACATING HEARING

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 5, 19 Defendants.

Plaintiff Keyhan Mohanna, representing himself, filed this case on May 20, 2021, alleging claims for wrongful foreclosure, violations of California Commercial Code § 3302 et seq., and quiet title against Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Dukes Partners II, LLC. [Docket No. 1 (“Compl.”).] Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, and a “federal court is presumed to lack jurisdiction in a particular case unless the contrary affirmatively appears.” Stock W., Inc. v. Confederated Tribes, 873 F.2d 1221, 1225 (9th Cir. 1989) (citations omitted). A federal court may exercise either federal question jurisdiction or diversity jurisdiction. Federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 requires a civil action to arise under the constitution,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.