Adams

Adams v. Manglicmot

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20214:19-cv-07952California4,172 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 HERRON A. ADAMS, Case No. 19-cv-07952-HSG Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

LINA MANGLICMOT, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 22 Defendants.

10 INTRODUCTION This is a federal civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by a pro se state prisoner. Plaintiff, an inmate at California Training Facility (“CTF”), alleges that defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs by failing to assign him a lower bunk. (ECF No. 1.) The Court GRANTS defendants’ motion for summary judgment (“Motion”). (ECF No. 22.) FACTUAL BACKGROUND This suit arises from defendants’ decision not to assign plaintiff a lower bunk despite his history of seizures or to provide pain medication to control his seizures. Plaintiff contends that RN Manglicmot was deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs when she failed to inform custody staff that plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.