Dixon

Dixon v. Cushman & Wakefield Western, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20213:18-cv-05813California10,287 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DIMITRI DIXON and RYAN SELTZ, Case No. 18-cv-05813-JSC individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR

Plaintiffs, PRELIMINARY APPROVAL v. Re: Dkt. No. 114

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD WESTERN, INC., et al., 12 Defendants. 13 In this wage and hour lawsuit, Plaintiffs allege that Cushman & Wakefield Western, Inc. unlawfully denied appraiser and senior appraiser employees guaranteed wage and overtime compensation due to their misclassification as exempt employees under California wage and hour 17 laws, and the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. The parties in Dixon have reached a global settlement which resolves three cases that are being combined into one amended complaint in the instant case for settlement purposes: (1) Dixon v. Cushman & Wakefield Western, Inc., Case No. 3:18-cv-05813-JSC (N.D. Cal.) (“Dixon I”); (2) Dixon v. Cushman & Wakefield, Inc., Case No. 3:20-cv-07001-JSC (N.D. Cal.)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.