Jackson v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBERT JACKSON, et al., Case No. 21-cv-04677-HSG Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
WITHDRAW
v. Re: Dkt. No. 22 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants. 12 Pending before the Court is a motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Dev D. Patel, attorney for Plaintiff Robert Jackson and Plaintiff Queen Jackson. Dkt. No. 22 (“Mot.”). The motion came on for hearing on August 26, 2021. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED subject to the conditions described below. I. LEGAL STANDARD In this district, “[c]ounsel may not withdraw from an action until relieved by order of Court after written notice has been given reasonably in advance to the client and to all other parties who have appeared in the case.” Civ. L.R. 11-5(a). Moreover, “[w]hen withdrawal by an attorney from an action is not accompanied by simultaneous appearance of substitute counsel or agreement of the party to appear pro se, leave to withdraw may be…