Clancy
Clancy v. Allstate Insurance Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 NORMAN CLANCY, Case No. 20-cv-08668-BLF
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
v. DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, et [Re: ECF No. 10] al., 11 Defendants.
13 Before the Court is Defendants Allstate Insurance Company, Robert Koban, and Roland Brenes’ (“Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 10 (“Motion”). Defendants argue that the Complaint should be dismissed for insufficient process, improper and untimely service of process, and lack of personal jurisdiction. Id. Plaintiff opposes, arguing that Defendants received notice of the lawsuit and failed to raise the issue with Plaintiff through meet-and-confer. ECF No. 20 (“Opp.”). The Court previously found this Motion suitable for disposition without oral argument. ECF No. 24. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the Motion WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Norman Clancy alleges that…