Smith v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20213:20-cv-05451California6,112 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 SUSAN SMITH, Case No. 20-cv-05451-CRB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO

v. DISMISS

WALGREENS BOOTS ALLIANCE, INC., et al., 12 Defendants. 13 Plaintiff Susan Smith filed a putative class action alleging that Defendants Costco 14 and Walgreens implemented opioid prescription fulfillment policies that discriminate 15 against disabled persons. The Court dismissed the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) 16 without prejudice. Order re FAC (“Order”) (dkt. 61). Plaintiff has now filed a Second 17 Amended Complaint. Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) (dkt. 71). Defendants have 18 moved to dismiss the SAC. Walgreens MTD SAC (dkt. 74); Costco MTD SAC (dkt. 76). 19 After careful review of the parties’ briefs, the Court concludes that there is no need for oral 20 argument. For the reasons explained below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motions to 21 dismiss without prejudice. 22 I. BACKGROUND A. FAC Allegations Plaintiff Susan Smith brought the FAC on behalf…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.