McGinity
McGinity v. The Proctor & Gamble Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 SEAN MCGINITY, Case No. 4:20-cv-08164-YGR
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS
vs. Re: Dkt. No. 19 THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY,
Defendant.
Plaintiff Sean McGinity bring this class action complaint against defendant Procter & Gamble Company (“P&G”) alleging that P&G fraudulently represented that the ingredients in its “PANTENE PRO-V NATUREFUSION” shampoos and conditioners (“Products”) were from nature or otherwise natural. (Dkt. No. 1) (“Compl.”) Plaintiff brings three causes of action: (1) violation of the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”), California Civil Code Section 1761(d); (2) violation of the California False Advertising Law (“FAL”), California Business and Professions Code Section 17500 et seq.; and (3) violation of the California Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), California Business and Professions Code Section 17200 et seq. Now before the Court is P&G’s motion to dismiss. (Dkt. No.19). The motion is…