Mireles
Mireles v. Koening
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RENE MIRELES, Case No. 20-cv-01248-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
v. JUDGMENT FOR FAILURE TO
EXHAUST ADMINISTRATIVE
C. KOENIG, et al., REMEDIES; REQUIRING RESPONSE
FROM DEFENDANTS
Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 27
13 Plaintiff filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Correctional Training Facility (“CTF”) correctional officials Koening, Lee, Ortega, and Gomez were deliberately indifferent to his safety, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Dkt. Nos. 1, 6, 8. Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Dkt. No. 27. Plaintiff has filed an opposition, Dkt. No. 36, and Defendants have filed a reply, Dkt. No. 37. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ summary judgment motion is DENIED. BACKGROUND I. Complaint Plaintiff…