Mireles

Mireles v. Koening

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20214:20-cv-01248California8,402 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RENE MIRELES, Case No. 20-cv-01248-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT FOR FAILURE TO

EXHAUST ADMINISTRATIVE

C. KOENIG, et al., REMEDIES; REQUIRING RESPONSE

FROM DEFENDANTS

Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 27

13 Plaintiff filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Correctional Training Facility (“CTF”) correctional officials Koening, Lee, Ortega, and Gomez were deliberately indifferent to his safety, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Dkt. Nos. 1, 6, 8. Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Dkt. No. 27. Plaintiff has filed an opposition, Dkt. No. 36, and Defendants have filed a reply, Dkt. No. 37. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ summary judgment motion is DENIED. BACKGROUND I. Complaint Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.