Austin v. State Bar
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20214:21-cv-06794California1,159 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT A
UG 31 292)
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SUsA
ERK TAN SO
NORTHERN US. Distror □□ EAN □□□ OF □□□
GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN, □
Case No. 21-cv-06794-TSH Qa Plaintiff, STATE BAR, Defendant.
Since you are representing yourself in this case, the Court issues this notice to you about legal resources available, the rules you’need to follow, and the legal standard that applies to 12 || summary judgment motions.
RESOURCES AVAILABLE a || 1. Pro Se Handbook: The district court has produced a guide for pro se litigants called ° Representing Yourself in Federal Court: A Handbook for Pro Se Litigants, which provides Q instructions on how to proceed at every stage of your case, including discovery, motions, and
trial. It is available electronically online (http://cand.uscourts.gov/prosehandbook) or in hard