Austin v. State Bar

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20214:21-cv-06794California1,159 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT A

UG 31 292)

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SUsA

ERK TAN SO

NORTHERN US. Distror □□ EAN □□□ OF □□□

GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN, □

Case No. 21-cv-06794-TSH Qa Plaintiff, STATE BAR, Defendant.

Since you are representing yourself in this case, the Court issues this notice to you about legal resources available, the rules you’need to follow, and the legal standard that applies to 12 || summary judgment motions.

RESOURCES AVAILABLE a || 1. Pro Se Handbook: The district court has produced a guide for pro se litigants called ° Representing Yourself in Federal Court: A Handbook for Pro Se Litigants, which provides Q instructions on how to proceed at every stage of your case, including discovery, motions, and

trial. It is available electronically online (http://cand.uscourts.gov/prosehandbook) or in hard

Z copy free…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.