Daramola

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TAYO E DARAMOLA, Case No. 19-cv-07910-JD

Plaintiff,

SECOND ORDER RE MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

ORACLE AMERICA, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 68 Defendants.

12 The parties’ familiarity with the record is assumed, and the Court incorporates the jurisdiction standards discussed in the first dismissal order, Dkt. No. 66. The renewed motion to dismiss defendants Patnaik, Gauvin, Bork, and Riseberg for lack of personal jurisdiction, Dkt. No. 68, is granted without prejudice. Plaintiff Daramola has not plausibly demonstrated that his claims arise out of conduct by these individuals in this District. At all pertinent times, Daramola resided and worked in Canada, each of the individuals resided and worked outside of California, and the key events involved customer accounts located outside of California. Daramola has not shown that his alleged injuries arose in any way out of the individuals’ conduct in California. On these undisputed facts,…