Jackson v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20214:21-cv-04677California395 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBERT JACKSON, et al., Case No. 21-cv-04677-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants.

12 On April 21, 2021, Plaintiffs Robert Jackson and Queen Jackson filed a complaint against Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and U.S. Bank in Contra Costa Superior Court. Dkt. No. 1. On June 17, 2021, Wells Fargo removed the case to federal court. Id. Both Defendants filed motions to dismiss, and the deadline to file any opposition has since passed. On August 27, 2021, the Court granted Plaintiffs’ counsel motion to withdraw due to Plaintiffs’ decision to terminate him as counsel and their consistent failure to communicate. If Plaintiffs are unable to obtain counsel, they may appear pro se, but must provide the Court with their contact information so that they may be served as individuals going forward. Because Plaintiffs did not appear at the hearing for the motion to withdraw and have failed to communicate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.