Calhoun
Calhoun v. Flrish, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GIA CALHOUN, Case No. 19-cv-08212-JCS
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO
FILE UNDER SEAL SHOULD NOT BE
FLRISH, INC., DENIED Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 100, 106
Plaintiff Gia Calhoun moves to file one paragraph of her amended complaint under seal, based on a confidentiality designation by non-party Springbig, Inc. The same proposed redaction is at issue in two separate administrative motions to file under seal (dkts. 100, 106), one pertaining to Calhoun’s since-granted motion for leave to amend, and the other pertaining to the amended complaint she filed as a separate docket entry after the Court granted her motion. Springbig filed a declaration by its Chief Financial Officer Paul Sykes in response to Calhoun’s first administrative motion, which offers the following justification for sealing:
4. Paragraph of the First Amended Class Action …