Calhoun

Calhoun v. Flrish, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 7, 20213:19-cv-08212California701 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GIA CALHOUN, Case No. 19-cv-08212-JCS

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO

FILE UNDER SEAL SHOULD NOT BE

FLRISH, INC., DENIED Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 100, 106

Plaintiff Gia Calhoun moves to file one paragraph of her amended complaint under seal, based on a confidentiality designation by non-party Springbig, Inc. The same proposed redaction is at issue in two separate administrative motions to file under seal (dkts. 100, 106), one pertaining to Calhoun’s since-granted motion for leave to amend, and the other pertaining to the amended complaint she filed as a separate docket entry after the Court granted her motion. Springbig filed a declaration by its Chief Financial Officer Paul Sykes in response to Calhoun’s first administrative motion, which offers the following justification for sealing:

4. Paragraph of the First Amended Class Action …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.