Ramachandran

Ramachandran v. City of Los Altos

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 7, 20215:18-cv-01223California1,539 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 SATISH RAMACHANDRAN, Case No. 18-cv-01223-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER CONDITIONALLY

v. GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL'S

MOTION TO WITHDRAW

CITY OF LOS ALTOS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 234 Defendants.

13 Counsel for plaintiff Satish Ramachandran move to withdraw from representation of plaintiff pursuant to Civil Local Rule 11-5. Dkt. No. 234. Defendants do not oppose the motion but do object to any continuance of the trial date. Dkt. Nos. 237, 244. At the request of all parties and given the proximity of trial, the Court held a case management conference and hearing regarding plaintiff’s counsel’s motion on expedited basis on August 26, 2021. Dkt. No. 238. Mr. Ramachandran personally attended the conference and advised the Court that he does not oppose his counsel’s withdrawal. Id. Having considered the parties’ submissions and arguments, the Court grants counsel’s motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.