Pauly

Pauly v. Stanford Health Care

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 7, 20213:18-cv-05387California914 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MAKENZIE PAULY, et al., Case No. 18-cv-05387-SI

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE FIRST DISCOVERY

v. LETTER

STANFORD HEALTH CARE, Re: Dkt. No. 72 Defendant.

12 On August 17, 2021, plaintiff Makenzie Pauly filed a first discovery letter regarding three subpoenas issued by defendant Stanford Health Care (“defendant’s subpoenas”). Dkt. No. 72. On August 20, 2021, defendant filed a letter in response. Dkt. No. 74. For the reasons stated below, the Court modifies defendant’s subpoenas to matters concerning plaintiff’s physical injuries during November 2008 and December 2008. 18 BACKGROUND This case arises from defendant’s alleged failure to screen and treat plaintiff in November 2008 and December 2008 (“Underlying Incident”). Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff claims she suffered personal injury from defendant’s alleged refusal to accept plaintiff as a transfer patient and provide plaintiff medical care. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.