Rescino

United States v. Rescino

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20215:20-cv-00881California1,832 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 5:20-cv-00881-BLF

Petitioner, ORDER DENYING RESPONDENT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS OR,

v. ALTERNATIVELY, TO TRANSFER

NICHOLAS C. RESCINO

[Re: ECF 36] Respondent.

12 The United States of America (“Petitioner”) has brought the present action against Nicholas Rescino (“Respondent”) to enforce an Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) summons. Pet., ECF 1. Respondent moves to dismiss the action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3) for improper venue; or, in the alternative, to transfer the action from the San Jose Division of the Northern District of California to the San Francisco Division of the Northern District of California under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a); or, in the alternative, to transfer the action from the San Jose Division to the San Francisco Division under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Am’d Mot., EFC 36. Because this motion is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.