Emerson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 KIMBERLY EMERSON, Case No. 20-cv-08607-YGR (AGT)

Plaintiff, v. DISCOVERY ORDER 8 Re: Dkt. No.

IRON MOUNTAIN INFORMATION

MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., et al., Defendants.

This order resolves the pending disputes over Emerson’s interrogatories. 1. Iron Mountain must answer Rog 3 in part. The company needs to identify the people who participated in the decision to terminate Emerson, and then describe the role each of them played in that decision. The company doesn’t need to describe “in detail each [such] person’s . . . communications regarding [Emerson’s] separation from her employment.” Dkt. 59-1 at 3. Emerson can seek that detail through more efficient means: she can depose the decisionmakers and seek their communications through document requests. 2. Iron Mountain must amend its response to Rog 5 to identify “each and every essential function of the project supervisor position held by [Emerson] in 2019.” Dkt. 59-1 at 4.…