Sanai

Sanai v. Kozinski

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 7, 20214:19-cv-08162California821 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CYRUS SANAI, Case No. 19-cv-08162-YGR (JD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE MOTION FOR LEAVE

v. AND MOTION FOR RELIEF

ALEX KOZINSKI, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 101, 98 Defendants.

Plaintiff Sanai’s request for leave to file a motion for relief is granted. Dkt. No. 101. For the sake of efficiency, the motion for relief, Dkt. No. 98, is deemed filed. The parties’ familiarity with the record is assumed, and relief from the orders on recusal, Dkt. Nos. 89, 96, is denied. The Northern District of California’s Civil Local Rule 7-9 governs motions for reconsideration proposed for filing “[b]efore the entry of a judgment adjudicating all of the claims and the rights and liabilities of all the parties in a case.” Civil L.R. 7-9(a). The rule provides guidance because Sanai is challenging the Court’s conclusions on recusal, and there will be no final “judgment” on that issue. In any event, irrespective of any technical niceties, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.