Marsh & McLennan Agency, LLC v. Teros Advisors, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARSH & MCLENNAN AGENCY, LLC, Case No. 20-cv-02679-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING CROSS-MOTIONS

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND

v. GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE

MOTIONS

TEROS ADVISORS, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 68, 71, 74, 76, 83 Defendants.

12 Pending before the Court are Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, Dkt. No. 68 (“Mot.”), 84 (“Opp.”), 86 (“Reply”), and Plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment, Dkt. No. 71 (“Cross Mot.”), 81 (“Cross Opp.”), 85 (“Cross Reply”). Also pending are Plaintiff’s administrative motions to file documents under seal in connection with its briefs. For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment and GRANTS Plaintiff’s administrative motions to seal.1 I. BACKGROUND “MMA is a world leader in the [sic] risk and insurance and in employee benefits brokerage and consulting” that “provides clients with a comprehensive array of benefits solutions,…