Poorsina

Poorsina v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20214:21-cv-05098California3,530 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ALI POORSINA, Case No. 21-cv-05098-DMR

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS

v. Re: Dkt. No. 6 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant.

Pro se Plaintiff Ali Poorsina filed a complaint against Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) alleging claims in connection with a loan Wells Fargo made to third parties. Wells Fargo now moves pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) to dismiss the complaint. [Docket No. 6.] The court held a hearing on September 9, 2021. For the following reasons, the motion is granted. I. BACKGROUND Poorsina makes the following allegations, all of which are taken as true for purposes of this motion. On September 7, 2017, real property at 1563 28th Avenue, San Francisco, California (the “property”) was sold at a “wrongful foreclosure trustee’s sale.” Compl. ¶ 13, Ex. A (Sept. 15, 2017 Trustee’s Deed). As the highest bidder, Tan Tseng, owner of Steppingstone Assets Group …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.