Kang

Kang v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Bad Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 20215:17-cv-06220California2,800 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 JAMES KANG and MICHAEL MOSES, individually and on behalf of all others Case No. 17-cv-06220-BLF similarly situated,

Plaintiffs, 10 v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

12 Defendant.

___________________________________ 14 PATRICIA BARRERAS and JACQUELINE Case No. 21-cv-00071-BLF F. IBARRA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO Plaintiffs, INTERVENE 17 v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

19 Defendant. 20 In this consolidated class action, Plaintiffs claim that Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”), has violated California state wage and hour laws with respect to its California- based mortgage sales force, referred to as home mortgage consultants (“HMCs”). The Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary approval of a class action settlement on April 1, 2021. See Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Approval, ECF 110. Plaintiffs’ motion for

27 1 The Kang…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.