Garcia

Garcia v. Maciel

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 20213:21-cv-03743California999 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORLANDO GARCIA,

Case No. 21-cv-03743-JCS Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART v. REQUEST FOR RELIEF FROM GENERAL ORDER 56 AND JESUS GARCIA MACIEL, et al., REQUIRING PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER Defendants. Re: Dkt. No.

Defendants Jesus Garcia Maciel, Monique Renee Ramos, Guadalupe Murillo, and Rigoberto Murillo seek administrative relief from General Order 56 to permit them to conduct discovery regarding Plaintiff Orlando Garcia’s standing for injunctive relief and stay the required site inspection until after resolution of the standing issue. Mot. (dkt. 13) at 1. Garcia opposes this motion. Decl. of Prathima Price (dkt. 16) ¶ 1. “The purpose of General Order 56 is to encourage the parties to cooperate to resolve ADA claims quickly and efficiently with minimal cost.” Johnson v. Reimal Fam. Ltd. P’ship,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.