Tandikul
Memphis Meats, Inc. v. Tandikul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MEMPHIS MEATS, INC.,
Case No. 21-cv-3072-YGR Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL OF RECORD v. TO SUBMIT FURTHER INFORMATION RE: WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL FOR
NAPAT TANDIKUL, DEFENDANT
14 Defendant. Dkt. No. 39
The Court has received the motion of defendant’s counsel (“Counsel”) to withdraw from representation of Defendant Napat Tandikul (“the Client”) in the above-captioned action, along with the accompanying declaration and plaintiff’s objection thereto. (Dkt. Nos. 39, 41, and 42.) The hearing on such motion is currently set for September 21, 2021. Plaintiff’s objection does not persuade, especially given the criminal overlay and the firing of the law firm. While clearly more convenient, plaintiff’s preferences do not control the legal basis for granting the motion. That litigating this case will become more difficult is not a basis for …