Contour IP Holding, LLC v. GoPro, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20213:17-cv-04738California9,025 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CONTOUR IP HOLDING, LLC, Case No. 3:17-cv-04738-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTION TO STRIKE,

v. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE

PLEADINGS, AND CLAIM

GOPRO, INC., CONSTRUCTION Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 535

12 CONTOUR IP HOLDING, LLC, Case No. 3:21-cv-02143-WHO

Plaintiff, v. Re: Dkt. No. 20

GOPRO, INC.,

Defendant.

18 Plaintiff and counter-defendant Contour IP Holdings, LLC (“Contour”) sued defendant and 19 counter-claimant GoPro, Inc. (“GoPro”) for patent infringement, alleging that several of GoPro’s 20 products infringe patents that concern point-of-view digital video cameras. Since then, Contour 21 filed a follow-on suit that asserts the same patents against newer GoPro products. Three matters 22 are before me: Contour’s motion to strike GoPro’s inequitable conduct affirmative defense in the 23 second suit, GoPro’s motion for judgment on the pleadings that the subject matter is unpatentable,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.