Strojnik

Strojnik v. Portola Hotel, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 20215:19-cv-07579California1,373 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 PETER STROJNIK, Case No. 19-cv-07579-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. RELIEF UNDER RULES 59 AND

PORTOLA HOTEL, LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 31 Defendant.

13 Before the Court is plaintiff Peter Strojnik’s motion for relief under Rules 59 and 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dkt. No. 31. Mr. Strojnik asks this Court to review its prior order dismissing his case for lack of standing (Dkt. No. 28), and to set aside the judgment entered against him and in favor of defendant Portola Hotel, LLC (“Portola”) (Dkt. No. 29). Portola opposes the motion. Dkt. No. 35. The Court finds Mr. Strojnik’s motion suitable for decision without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered the parties’ submissions and the record as a whole, the Court denies Mr. Strojnik’s motion for relief under Rules 59 and 60. I. BACKGROUND The Court detailed the facts underlying…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.