Bradley

Bradley v. County of Sonoma

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 20214:19-cv-07464California1,149 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RANDI BRADLEY, et al., Case No. 19-cv-07464-KAW

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. APPROVE MINOR'S COMPROMISE

COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 73 Defendants.

12 Plaintiffs Randi Bradley and A.B. filed the instant case against Defendants, asserting that Defendants violated Plaintiffs’ constitutional rights when they separated Plaintiffs. (See First Amended Compl. (“FAC”) ¶ 8, Dkt. No. 66.) Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to approve a minor’s compromise. (Pl.’s Mot. to Approve, Dkt. No. 73.) No oppositions were filed. The Court deems this matter suitable for disposition without a hearing pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). Having considered Plaintiffs’ motion and supplemental brief, as well as the relevant legal authority, the Court GRANTS the motion to approve. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Bradley obtained guardianship of Plaintiff A.B. in May 2008 and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.