Stanfield
Stanfield v. Tawkify, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JEREMY STANFIELD, Plaintiff, No. C 20–07000 WHA
v.
ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY
TAWKIFY, INC., JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT Defendant.
14 INTRODUCTION In this civil action based on California’s Dating Services Contracts Act, defendant dating service moves for summary judgment. Plaintiff has already received a full refund. For that reason and others, summary judgment is GRANTED for Tawkify and against Stanfield. STATEMENT Plaintiff Jeremy Stanfield paid $3700 to an online dating service to line up six dates. After two dates, neither to his liking, he cancelled the contract and demanded a full refund from defendant Tawkify, Inc., a matchmaking-style dating service. Tawkify had already begun arranging his third date, so it promptly refunded a pro rata amount, namely half of the contract price. Stanfield then demanded all $3700 and threatened to file a lawsuit, which he did (this 25 …