Stuckey
Stuckey v. Risenhoover
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ANDRE KENNETH STUCKEY,
Case No. 19-cv-03780-YGR (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER RELATING TO SERVICE v. ISSUES INVOLVING DEFENDANT DR. M. BOSTANJIAN; DIRECTING SUE RISENHOOVER, et al., PLAINTIFF TO CLARIFY WHETHER HE STILL WISHES TO VOLUNTARILY Defendants. DISMISS DEFENDANT BOSTANJIAN; AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST
FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-REPLY
10 This Order addresses issues regarding service in the above-captioned action, and it also 11 addresses Plaintiff’s pending motion for leave to file a sur-reply. Dkt. 55. 12 Service has been ineffective on Defendant Dr. Maria Bostanjian. Initially, the Court had 13 been informed Defendant Bostanjian was not served because “Pelican Bay State Prison does not 14 have authorization to accept service for [these] individuals.” Dkt. 14. 15 As Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, he is responsible for providing the Court…