Stuckey

Stuckey v. Risenhoover

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20214:19-cv-03780California1,048 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDRE KENNETH STUCKEY,

Case No. 19-cv-03780-YGR (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER RELATING TO SERVICE v. ISSUES INVOLVING DEFENDANT DR. M. BOSTANJIAN; DIRECTING SUE RISENHOOVER, et al., PLAINTIFF TO CLARIFY WHETHER HE STILL WISHES TO VOLUNTARILY Defendants. DISMISS DEFENDANT BOSTANJIAN; AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST

FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-REPLY

10 This Order addresses issues regarding service in the above-captioned action, and it also 11 addresses Plaintiff’s pending motion for leave to file a sur-reply. Dkt. 55. 12 Service has been ineffective on Defendant Dr. Maria Bostanjian. Initially, the Court had 13 been informed Defendant Bostanjian was not served because “Pelican Bay State Prison does not 14 have authorization to accept service for [these] individuals.” Dkt. 14. 15 As Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, he is responsible for providing the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.