Davidson

Davidson v. Hewlett-Packard Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20215:16-cv-01928California5,954 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 JONATHAN MARC DAVIDSON, et al., Case No. 5:16-cv-01928-EJD Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 10 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 203 11 Defendants. 12 Pro se Plaintiffs Jonathan Marc Davidson and Corinna Davidson (collectively “Plaintiffs”) brought this action against Defendants Hewlett-Packard Company n/k/a HP Inc., Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (“HPE”), United Healthcare Services, Inc., UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (“United Healthcare” or “UHC”), Dr. Angelique Green, Dr. Peter Stangel, Dr. Edward Greenberg, and Dr. Lauren Standig (collectively, “Defendants”) seeking damages relating to Defendants’ decision to end Jonathan Davidson’s medical care at a rehabilitation center and transfer him to custodial care at home. On August 15, 2019, the Court dismissed with prejudice all of the claims alleged by Plaintiffs in their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.