Kant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 PAULA JEAN KANT, Case No. 21-cv-05827-AGT

Plaintiff,

SCREENING ORDER

v.

UNITED STATES, et al. Defendants.

Having granted Paula Jean Kant’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, see dkt. 10, the undersigned magistrate judge now screens her complaint, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), and concludes that it is deficient. The Clerk of the Court is accordingly instructed not to issue summonses or to serve Kant’s complaint on the defendants. If Kant fails to file a satisfactory amendment, the undersigned will recommend that a district judge dismiss her case.1 A. The Allegations Kant’s pro se complaint is difficult to follow. As best the Court can tell, here are the basic facts she’s alleged. In 2007, Kant used her funds and credit to finance someone else’s start-up business. Shortly after, she learned that the start-up founder was a scam artist. See Dkt. 1 at 10. To protect herself and her Northern California-based home…