Nasiri

Nasiri v. T.A.G. Security Protective Services Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20215:18-cv-01170California3,226 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 ELIAS NASIRI, Case No. 18-cv-01170-NC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO v. ALTER JUDGMENT AND MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL

T.A.G. SECURITY PROTECTIVE

SERVICES INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 259 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Elias Nasiri filed a motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59 to alter or amend the judgment, or in the alternative, for a new trial. Dkt. No. 259 “Mot.” The Court finds this motion suitable for ruling without oral argument. The Court DENIES Nasiri’s motion to alter judgment and DENIES the motion for new trial. The Court held a jury trial on Nasiri’s individual federal and California labor claims against T.A.G. Security Protective Services, Inc., Anthony Murga, doing business as T.A.G. Security Protective Services, and Gabriela Lopez, from May 17, 2021, to May 19, 2021. After close of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.