Risher
Risher v. Adecco Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CLARENCE RISHER,
Case No. 19-cv-05602-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ADECCO INC., et al., 13 Defendants.
15 In this putative class action, plaintiff Clarence Risher alleges defendants Adecco, Inc. and Mya Systems, Inc. violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227 (“TCPA”) by sending two text messages to his cell phone that solicited him for possible employment through Adecco, which operates a job placement service. Risher previously amended his complaint three times to make relatively minor changes, once as of right, and twice by stipulation or without opposition. Risher now seeks leave to file a fourth amended complaint, which defendants oppose, arguing undue delay, futility, and lack of good cause to amend the scheduling order. The deadline set in the scheduling order for amending pleadings expressly applies to doing so “without seeking leave from the…