Lesnik v.Eisenmann SE

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 20215:16-cv-01120California7,399 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

1 A. Factual Background 2 1. The Parties 3 Defendant ISM Vuzem d.o.o. is a Slovenian business entity with its principal place of 4 business in Slovenia. Third Amended Complaint, ECF No. 269, at ¶ 9 (“TAC”). Defendant ISM 5 Vuzem USA, Inc. was a South Carolina corporation with its principal place of business in South 6 Carolina. Id. at ¶ 12. Defendant Vuzem USA, Inc. was a California corporation with its principal 7 place of business in California. Id. at ¶ 13. Defendant Robert Vuzem is a resident of Slovenia. Id. 8 at ¶ 10. Defendant Ivan Vuzem is a resident of Slovenia. Id. at ¶ 11. Defendant HRID-MONT 9 d.o.o. is a Slovenian corporation with its principal place of business in Slovenia. Id. at ¶ 14. 10 Defendant Gregurec Ltd is an English business entity with its principal place of business in 11 England. Id. at ¶ 18. Defendant LB Metal d.o.o. is a Slovenian corporation with its principal 12 place of business in Slovenia. Id. at ¶ 32. Defendant Mos Servis d.o.o. is a Slovenian corporation 13 with its principal place of business in Slovenia. Id. at ¶ 44. Defendant Magna, d.o.o. is a 14 Slovenian corporation with its principal place of business in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.