Nasiri

Nasiri v. T.A.G. Security Protective Services Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20215:18-cv-01170California4,270 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 ELIAS NASIRI, Case No. 18-cv-01170-NC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES v. Re: Dkt. No. 255

T.A.G. SECURITY PROTECTIVE

SERVICES INC., et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Elias Nasiri moves for an award of his attorneys’ fees in the amount of $244,641.41, the total number of hours and fees expended in his case. See Dkt. No. 255 (“Mot.”); see also Dkt. No. 258 (“Opp’n”). Upon considering the parties’ briefs, the outcome of both trials, and the Court’s observation throughout the life of this case, the Court DENIES Nasiri’s motion for attorneys’ fees in full. I. BACKGROUND Between June 25, 2015, and December 22, 2016, Plaintiff Elias Nasiri worked as a security guard for Anthony Murga, doing business as T.A.G. Security Protective Services. Dkt. No. 250 “Findings of Fact” at 4. Defendant Anthony Murga formed T.A.G. Security Protective…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.