Madej
Madej v. Synchrony Bank
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 JAKUB MADEJ, CASE NO. 21-cv-02713-YGR
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING
IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS, TRANSFER,
vs. OR STAY
SYNCHRONY BANK, Re: Dkt. No. 38 Defendant.
Plaintiff Jakub Madej first filed an action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) in the Eastern District of New York on April 6, 2021, against defendant Synchrony Bank, incorrectly named as Synchrony Financial, in connection with 572 alleged robocalls made by defendant between November 2020 and March 2021. (Dkt. No. 27.) One week later, plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a TCPA action in this District on April 15, 2021, against defendant PayPal Credit, which has since been substituted for the proper defendant Synchrony Bank. (Dkt. No. 1.) The complaint in this action alleges defendant made at least 40 robocalls in November 2020. (Id. ¶ 1.) Despite filing an answer on June 10, 2020 (Dkt. No. 15), which…