Mai
Mai v. Supercell Oy
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 PETER MAI, Case No. 5:20-cv-05573-EJD
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
DISMISS
v.
SUPERCELL OY, Re: Dkt. No. 25 Defendant.
13 Plaintiff Peter Mai brings this putative class action against Defendant Supercell Oy (“Supercell”) asserting the following claims: (1) unlawful and unfair business practices in violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200, et seq.; (2) violation of California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1750, et seq.; and (3) unjust enrichment. Compl., Dkt. No. 1. Presently before the Court is Supercell’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 9(b). Def. Supercell Oy’s Mot. to Dismiss (“Mot.”), Dkt. No. 25. The Court finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil …