Lesnik v.Eisenmann SE

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 20215:16-cv-01120California11,790 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. Case No. 16-CV-01120-LHK

GREGOR LESNIK; STJEPAN PAPES,

13 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD

14 v. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

AS TO TRAFFICKING VICTIMS

PROTECTION REAUTHORIZATION EISENMANN SE, et al., ACT CLAIM 16 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 560 17 Before the Court is Plaintiffs Gregor Lesnik and Stjepan Papes’ (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) third motion for default judgment as to Plaintiffs’ Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (“TVPRA”) claim against Defendants ISM Vuzem d.o.o., ISM Vuzem USA, Inc., Vuzem USA, Inc., Robert Vuzem, Ivan Vuzem, and HRID-Mont, d.o.o. ECF Nos. 560 (“Mot.”). Having considered the Plaintiffs’ briefing, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiffs’ third motion for default judgment as to Plaintiffs’ TVPRA claim. I. BACKGROUND A.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.