Vincent

Vincent v. San Francisco Sheriff's Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20211:19-cv-00329-RMICalifornia1,302 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 CAMERON OMARI VINCENT, Case No. 19-cv-00329-RMI

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS

v. IN LIMINE

JONATHAN REYES, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 69, 70, 71, 72 Defendants.

13 Pending before the court are four motions in limine filed by Defendants to exclude certain forms of evidence from trial. Pursuant to Civil Local R. 7-1(b), the court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and rules as follows. LEGAL STANDARD “A motion in limine is a procedural mechanism to limit in advance testimony or evidence in a particular area.” United States v. Heller, 551 F.3d 1108, 1111 (9th Cir. 2009) (citation omitted). The motion procures “an evidentiary ruling” over which a district court has “discretion” pursuant to its “inherent authority to manage the course of trials.” United States v. Komisaruk, 885 F.2d 490, 492 (9th Cir. 1989); United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.