Washington v. Pacific Credit Exchange

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20214:21-cv-02374California3,089 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RICHARD WASHINGTON, Case No. 21-cv-02374-JCS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION

v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

PACIFIC CREDIT EXCHANGE, COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE

DISMISSED

Defendant. 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 1,

12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Richard Washington, pro se, applies to proceed in forma pauperis. See dkt. 3. Sufficient cause having been shown, that application is GRANTED. The Court now reviews the sufficient of Washington’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Washington is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his complaint should not be dismissed for the reasons discussed below. No later than October 18, 2021, Washington must file either an amended complaint curing the deficiencies addressed in this order or a response arguing why his current complaint is sufficient. If Washington does not file such a response or his response fails to cure the deficiencies addressed herein, the case will be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.