Feamster

Feamster v. Gaco Western, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20214:18-cv-01327California819 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBERT SCOTT FEAMSTER, Case No. 18-cv-01327-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR

v. PLAINTIFF

GACO WESTERN, LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 142 Defendant.

12 Pending before the Court is a motion to withdraw as counsel by Eustace de Saint Phalle, Ilya Frangos, and Chantele L. Fitting, attorneys for Plaintiff Scott Feamster. Dkt. No. 137 (“Mot.”). Mr. de Saint Phalle, Ms. Frangos, and Ms. Fitting seek to withdraw as counsel for Mr. Feamster on the basis that the “relationship between Mr. Feamster and counsel has deteriorated to the point where it is impossible for counsel to continue to represent him and to take the necessary litigation strategies and steps to continue to pursue and protect his best interests.” Mot. at 4. Plaintiff’s counsel informed Mr. Feamster that they would seek to withdraw based upon “irreconcilable differences that created a conflict and made continued representation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.